MCOLES State Licensing Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the MCOLES State Licensing Exam with comprehensive flashcards and practice questions that include helpful hints and detailed explanations to ensure your readiness for exam day!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What must a suspect be informed of prior to police questioning, according to the Miranda v. Arizona ruling?

Their right to bail
Their right to a speedy trial
Their rights to consult with an attorney and against self-incrimination
Their right to remain silent after arrest

The correct answer is: Their rights to consult with an attorney and against self-incrimination

In the context of the Miranda v. Arizona ruling, a suspect must be informed of their rights to consult with an attorney and their right against self-incrimination before any police questioning can occur. This requirement stems from the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from being compelled to testify against themselves, and the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees the right to legal counsel. When a person is in custody and subject to interrogation, law enforcement must ensure that the suspect understands these critical rights. Failure to inform a suspect of these rights can lead to any statements made during interrogation being deemed inadmissible in court. The Miranda warning serves to protect the suspect's constitutional rights and ensure that any waiver of those rights is made knowingly and voluntarily. The other options pertain to different rights that are significant in the criminal justice process but are not specifically required as part of the Miranda warning. Options regarding bail or a speedy trial come into play at different stages of legal proceedings but do not address the immediate protections needed during custodial interrogation.